ArticleDiabetologia2026
Incidence and independent risk factors for heart failure in a population-based cohort of 19,892 individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisHeart failure (HF) is a common complication of diabetes, associated with a high mortality rate and a substantial healthcare burden. Residual HF risk persists despite achieving current treatment targets, suggesting a role for additional mechanisms beyond conventional risk factors. We sought to prospectively assess HF incidence and independent risk factors in individuals with new-onset diabetes.
methodsWe used a prospective inception cohort (ANDIS, n=19,892) that included all individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes from southern Sweden between 2008 and 2021. Baseline clinical, biochemical and questionnaire data were linked to the Region Scania Care Database to obtain data on cardiovascular events and to the National Diabetes Registry to gather further data on cardiovascular risk factors that were not collected in the ANDIS study protocol. All-cause HF included all cases of HF regardless of underlying aetiology, whereas non-ischaemic HF was defined as HF occurring in individuals without prior acute myocardial infarction at baseline or during follow-up before the HF diagnosis. Cardiovascular disease incidence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the associations with risk factors and incident HF were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsThe median age of the overall population was 62.5 years (IQR 52.6-70.3), while the median age among individuals who developed incident all-cause HF was 69.8 years (IQR 62.7-76.7). A total of 819 individuals (4.1%) with prevalent HF were excluded. During up to 14 years of follow-up (median 5.0), the cumulative incidence of HF was 4.8%, exceeding that of myocardial infarction (3.0%). No individuals with type 1 diabetes developed HF, but the incidence was similar across those with type 2 diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, and secondary diabetes. A lower eGFR and higher HOMA2-IR, were associated with increased risk of all-cause and non-ischaemic HF, independently of the presence of conventional risk factors. Insulin resistance predicted all-cause HF independently of the established SCORE2-Diabetes risk score. The hazard ratio (HR) per 1 SD increase in HOMA2-IR was highest in the low-risk group (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.02, 3.48; p=4.3 × 10 CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe HF incidence was high, with approximately 1 in 20 individuals developing HF within 5 years after diagnosis of diabetes other than type 1, highlighting a notably high risk of developing HF soon after diabetes diagnosis. Beyond conventional risk factors, higher HOMA2-IR and lower renal function, but not hyperglycaemia or autoantibodies, were independent risk factors for HF. Measuring HOMA2-IR also provided prognostic information in addition to that provided by the SCORE2-Diabetes risk score, supporting its value in HF risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.