Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547577›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026

[Excimer laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty for stromal scarring after epikeratoplasty].

Anna-Sophie Heiland, Berthold Seitz, Fidelis Flockerzi, Kim Yoo-Jin, Elias Flockerzi, Loay Daas, Tim Berger

Abstract readCase ReportsEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna-Sophie HeilandKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes UKS, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland. anna-sophie.heiland@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9726-1623
Berthold SeitzKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes UKS, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
Fidelis FlockerziInstitut für Allgemeine und Spezielle Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland.
Kim Yoo-JinInstitut für Allgemeine und Spezielle Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland.
Elias FlockerziKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes UKS, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
Loay DaasKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes UKS, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
Tim BergerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes UKS, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 22, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpikeratoplasty was previously used as a treatment option for correcting high myopia and keratoconus; however, structural complications, including interface scarring, surface irregularities and corneal ectasia, are not uncommon during follow-up. CASE: A 55-year-old male patient presented with decreased visual acuity in the right eye. He had undergone an epikeratoplasty in South Korea 34 years earlier to improve visual acuity due to high myopia. As the postoperative visual acuity remained inadequate, an additional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed at a later stage. In terms of surface irregularity, anterior stromal scarring, increased central corneal thickening to 708 μm, and contact lens intolerance as well as corticonuclear cataract, a penetrating excimer laser keratoplasty with simultaneous cataract surgery (triple-PKP) was recommended; however, the patient initially opted to have the epikeratoplasty lenticule removed first at an external clinic. Upon re-examination a significant thinning of the corneal stroma was noted. Therefore, the previously recommended triple-PKP procedure was performed on the right eye. Postoperatively, a substantial improvement in visual acuity, from 0.05 to 0.4, was already evident at the 6‑month visit.

conclusionLenticule removal can be associated with a variety of complications. In this case, a triple-PKP procedure was considered the most appropriate treatment option to restore anatomical stability and achieve visual rehabilitation without delay.

Indexed as

CicatrixCorneal StromaKeratoplasty, PenetratingLasers, ExcimerPostoperative ComplicationsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyopiaVisual AcuityDegenerative myopiaEpikeratoplastyPenetrating keratoplastyPhotorefractive keratectomyStromal scarring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.