ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Prognostic value of cribriform pattern and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis using contemporary consensus recommendations.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCribriform pattern (CP) and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) are recognised as adverse histopathological markers. However, their precise prognostic weight in the post-radical prostatectomy (RP) setting remains poorly standardised. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the association between CP/IDC-P and biochemical recurrence (BCR).
methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published from 2016 onwards, coinciding with the 2016 WHO and subsequent ISUP consensus recommendations. The primary endpoint was BCR. Hazard ratios (HR) were synthesised using random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation.
resultsEight retrospective studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The cumulative prevalence of CP/IDC-P was 27%. On univariable analysis, CP/IDC-P was significantly associated with BCR (HR: 2.76; 95% CI: 2.23-3.41). This association remained robust in multivariable models adjusting for pathological stage and Grade Group (HR: 2.59; 95% CI: 1.44-4.67) and CAPRA-based preoperative frameworks (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.03-3.08). Isolated CP demonstrated a more stable prognostic signal (HR: 3.16) compared to IDC-P (HR: 4.24), the latter being characterised by wider prediction intervals. The main limitations include the retrospective nature of primary studies and the inherent risk of confounding.
conclusionsCP and IDC-P are potent, independent predictors of BCR following RP. These findings support the mandatory reporting of such architectures according to ISUP standards and their integration into contemporary post-surgical risk-stratification algorithms to optimise follow-up and adjuvant therapy selection.
Identifiers
42547539What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.