Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547453›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Next-Generation Neural Mass Models Reproduce Features of Speech Processing.

Andrew Shannon, David Andrew William Barton, Martin Homer, Conor Houghton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew ShannonSchool of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom andrew.shannon@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9216-3188
David Andrew William BartonSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-4239
Martin HomerSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9848-1409
Conor HoughtonSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5017-9473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segregation of speech into syllables is a key step in neural speech processing. It relies on the alignment of neural activity with the rhythmic structure of speech. Two competing hypotheses explain this "neural speech tracking", phase-resetting and evoked responses. While phenomenological modeling of these hypotheses has been successful, we still lack understanding of the underlying cortical circuits. To investigate these mechanisms, we evaluate whether a biophysical next-generation neural mass model (NMM) can reproduce several features of neural speech tracking, using phenomenological models of the competing hypotheses as algorithmic baselines. We investigate the models' dynamics with four tests: recreating in silico an EEG experiment that identified a correlation between tracking strength and phoneme sharpness, computing the phase concentration metric, testing the effect of varying syllabic rates, and evaluating the inter event phase coherence (IEPC) across phoneme onsets. While all of the models that we study reproduce the sharpness-tuned rhythmic speech tracking, the evoked model requires a pre-processed acoustic edge impulse stimulus. We demonstrate that the NMM is performing thresholded phase-resetting triggered by sharp onsets in the continuous speech envelope. This produces cross-frequency nested oscillations that qualitatively match an experimentally-observed dual-peak signature in the IEPC. Our results indicate that the biophysical NMM provides a mechanistic bridge between generic oscillatory dynamics in cortical populations and the cognitive computations of speech tracking. Indeed, the nonlinear dynamics of the NMM offer an explanation for how peak-rate event representations in auditory cortex activity arise in response to continuous acoustic input.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyHumansbiophysical modelingmathematical modelingneural mass modelspeech processingsyllable segregation

Identifiers

PMID42547453
PMCPMC13505880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.