ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2026
Development of Design-Phase Digital Twin for Structural Optimization of a Biomedical Device.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital twins have transformed design and verification workflows in engineering, yet their adoption within medical device development remains limited. Conventional build-and-test approaches restrict design space exploration and often delay identification of mechanically critical risks. This paper presents a case study on the development of a calibrated, design-phase behavioral digital twin for a capsule-based biomedical delivery system used in dentistry, with the annular snap-fit nozzle-to-body interface selected as a representative mechanically sensitive feature. Empirical testing, analytical snap-fit theory and nonlinear Finite Element Analysis (FEA) were integrated to characterize mating force, strain and structural safety during assembly. Strong pre-calibration agreement was observed between the analytical and numerical models and back-calculation of an effective polymer-to-polymer coefficient of friction (μ = 0.12) reduced prediction error relative to empirical measurements to within experimental repeatability, establishing a validated behavioral digital twin. Design optimization employed a Taguchi orthogonal array to efficiently explore strain-constrained geometric variation. Results identified undercut depth, governed by nozzle inner diameter, as the dominant contributor to retention strength. An optimized configuration achieved a 65%-75% increase in mating force relative to the baseline design while remaining within permissible strain limits. Numerical verification predicted peak mating force of 190 N and identified localized stress concentrations in the nozzle neck region, highlighting reinforcement requirements before production tooling. Physical verification and validation of the optimized system confirmed the predicted increase in structural performance. Consistent with the digital twin maturity continuum, the framework is positioned as a design-phase, behavioral digital twin. It operates with offline one-way physical-to-digital data flow during the product realization stage, with automated bidirectional synchronization identified as the next stage of development. These findings demonstrate how digital twins can shift biomedical device development from reactive validation towards predictive, manufacturability-aware design, strengthening patient safety, clinician confidence and regulatory assurance in Class II medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.