Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42547244›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open quality2026

Evidence on the links between patient experience and safety: a systematic review.

Jenny King, Esther Ainley, Molly Hopson, Amy Tallett, Cara Witwicki, Bernardine Jappah, Adèle Bouyer, Chris Graham

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenny KingPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8291-8696
Esther AinleyPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Molly HopsonPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Amy TallettPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK amy.tallett@pickereurope.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-0731
Cara WitwickiPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Bernardine JappahPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Adèle BouyerPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.
Chris GrahamPicker Institute Europe, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-8171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience and safety are central to healthcare quality, yet their relationship remains underexplored. While earlier evidence suggests a positive association, policy and practice are continually developing around the world. This review systematically examines the literature to better understand how patient experience and safety are linked.

methodsSearches were conducted via PubMed (2000-2023) using predefined terms on patient experience and safety. Articles were uploaded to Rayyan, duplicates removed and titles and abstracts screened for relevance. Full articles were reviewed and 30 eligible studies were included. A narrative synthesis was performed, with quality and evidence strength assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.

resultsEvidence regarding the relationship between patient experience and safety was heterogeneous. Seven studies demonstrated consistent positive associations, 6 reported no association and 17 yielded mixed findings across different safety metrics. Among these 17 studies, 7 tended to support a positive association, 5 suggested no association and 5 reported results that varied according to the analytical approach. DISCUSSION: This review found mixed evidence on the relationship between patient experience and safety, and causality remains unknown. While some research identified clear associations, others showed considerable variation, often influenced by the specific measures used. Studies focused on secondary care, leaving gaps in primary and mental health settings. Notably, no research examined links between safety and the Picker Principles of 'fast access to healthcare advice' or 'family and carer involvement'-domains considered vital to safety.The review suggests that future research should explore domain-specific links and include experimental designs to strengthen causal understanding of the granular elements of safety and experience. Further investigation across care settings and population subgroups would help to fully understand how patient experience influences safety and vice versa.Overall, this review provides evidence that patient experience and safety are related but distinct concepts that should be addressed together in quality improvement efforts.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPatient SatisfactionHumansQuality of Health CareHealth services researchPatient-centred carePatient safetySystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID42547244
PMCPMC13436084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.