ArticlePoultry science2026
Cell phone image analysis as a proxy for laboratory egg quality measurements.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise individual-level recording of egg quality for genetic improvement requires laboratory instruments often unavailable at field test locations or in developing countries where breeding programs where local breeds are being developed. This study evaluated smartphone camera-derived measurements validating them against laboratory references for shell color (measured with Minolta colorimeter), egg weight, and defect classification in 359 matched eggs (180 brown, 179 white; 180 defective, 179 normal). Eggs were segmented out using SAM3 text-prompted segmentation applied to each raw photograph. A custom Python image pipeline extracted CIE L* (lightness), a*(redness on red-green scale), b*(yellowness on blue-yellow scale), chroma, morphometric axes, projected area, shape index, and surface defect scores from a mean of 2 images per egg acquired with a smartphone stabilized on a tripod, additionally a scale calibration from a physical reference sticker was considered. Combined-group validation statistics for image-derived color components against colorimeter values were high (Pearson r ≥ 0.986, 10-fold cross-validated R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.