ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2026
Reproductive health considerations for HIV prevention integrated care models for women who inject drugs: Qualitative perspective of participants and providers in HIV Prevention Trials Network 094.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCisgender women who inject drugs (WWID) face gendered health inequities and unique barriers to accessing healthcare services. We explored WWID's sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs to inform the development of integrated care for this population.
methodsThe HPTN 094 (INTEGRA) study tested the efficacy of delivering mobile integrated services for people who inject drugs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 116 INTEGRA participants and staff to identify barriers and facilitators for medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and HIV prevention and treatment. We conducted a thematic analysis of qualitative data from 38 interviews (n = 23 participants; n = 15 staff; n = 31 cisgender women; n = 3 cisgender men; n = 3 nonbinary) containing narratives around WWID's SRH. Findings were contextualized within the Sexual and Reproductive Justice Framework (SRJF) to understand WWID's SRH experiences and to inform equitable integrated care.
resultsWe identified three themes related to SRJF. First, aligned with the justice-based perspective (i.e., the socio-structural factors impacting SRH), participants detailed the "real-life" implications of being a WWID, including the disproportionate reproduction, parenting, and household management responsibilities (i.e., "responsibility of care") that impede SRH service utilization. Second, participants highlighted how systemic barriers (i.e., limited access to specialized providers and pervasive stigma) undermine care. Third, aligned with the rights-based perspective (i.e., promoting reproductive freedom), participants underscored the importance of centering WWID's voices to inform equitable SRH services. DISCUSSION: Findings highlight the disproportionate responsibility of care WWID face, how this responsibility and stigma negatively impact SRH access, and the need for mobile, integrated care options that address the needs of WWID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.