ArticleGenetics2026
The evolution of genetic drift over 50,000 generations.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Random variation in reproductive success-genetic drift-profoundly shapes genetic diversity and evolutionary trajectories. The strength of drift depends on the variance in descendant number, σd2, which governs key evolutionary outcomes: for instance, the establishment probability of a beneficial mutation scales inversely with σd2. However, whether σd2 itself evolves over long timescales has remained unclear, because allele-frequency fluctuations depend on drift only through the effective population size, Ne=N/σd2, which blends census population size with descendant-number variance. Here, we disentangle these components by using model-based Bayesian inference combined with joint tracking of (i) frequency fluctuations of neutrally barcoded lineages and (ii) census population sizes across growth cycles in the Escherichia coli long-term evolution experiment (LTEE). Analyzing 33 clones spanning the ancestor through 50,000 generations in two replicate populations (Ara-2 and Ara+2), we find that the strength of genetic drift evolved markedly-and divergently-between the two replicate populations. Both census size and σd2 changed substantially through time, with most variation in Ne driven by shifts in σd2 rather than census size. After approximately 2,000 generations, the σd2 of the two populations diverged sharply: Ara+2 generally remained close to a bottleneck-only null expectation, whereas Ara-2 exhibited 1.5-5× stronger drift, consistent with an evolved increase in stochasticity during growth. These results imply that mutations can alter both the mean and the variance of the descendant-number distribution, and we show that the joint distribution of mutational effects on fitness and on σd2 can substantially modulate the rate of adaptation. The key parameter governing genetic drift can therefore itself evolve in the LTEE, with direct consequences for adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.