Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42546063›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Effectiveness, safety, and implementation outcomes of a decentralization program to deliver antivenoms in the Western Brazilian Amazonia: The SAVING program.

Wuelton Monteiro, Felipe Murta, Thiago Serrão-Pinto, Vinicius Machado, Altair Seabra de Farias, Alícia Cacau Dos Santos, Deugles Cardoso, Elder Augusto Guimarães Figueira, Érica Cristina da Silva Chagas, Luana Souza Habibe and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Wuelton MonteiroSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0848-1940
Felipe MurtaSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Thiago Serrão-PintoSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Vinicius MachadoSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Altair Seabra de FariasSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Alícia Cacau Dos SantosSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Deugles CardosoDepartment of Environmental Surveillance, Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas Dra. Rosemary Costa Pinto, Manaus, Brazil.
Elder Augusto Guimarães FigueiraDepartment of Environmental Surveillance, Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas Dra. Rosemary Costa Pinto, Manaus, Brazil.
Érica Cristina da Silva ChagasDepartment of Environmental Surveillance, Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas Dra. Rosemary Costa Pinto, Manaus, Brazil.
Luana Souza HabibeIndigenous Health Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Leonardo da Silva IpuchimaIndigenous Health Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Nilzoney Ferreira de SouzaIndigenous Health Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Taynnah da Silva LimaIndigenous Health Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Flávio Santos DouradoSecretariat for Health and Environmental Surveillance, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Lucia MontebelloSecretariat for Health and Environmental Surveillance, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Francisco Edilson Ferreira de Lima-JuniorSecretariat for Health and Environmental Surveillance, Ministry of Health, Brasília, Brazil.
Nicholas R CasewellCentre for Snakebite Research and Interventions, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
David G LallooDepartment of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Fernando Almeida-ValSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Marcus LacerdaSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Joao Ricardo Nickenig VissociGlobal Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Charles J GerardoGlobal Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Fan Hui WenSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Jacqueline SachettSchool of Health Sciences, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.

Funding

Using community health centers to mitigate the impact of snakebite envenoming in low resource areasR21TW011944 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERARDO, CHARLES JOHN · 2021 to 2022
$534k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW011944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSnakebite envenoming (SBE) is a major cause of morbidity in mortality in low-income and middle-income countries. In Brazil, SBE disproportionately affects Indigenous populations. Limited access to antivenom treatment is a key determinant of poor outcomes in these populations. We evaluated the effectiveness and feasibility of a decentralized model of antivenom delivery in Indigenous primary health settings in the Brazilian Amazon.

methodsAn implementation study was carried out in four Indigenous Health Poles across Amazonas state, Brazil. Effectiveness was assessed using a pre-post design based on national surveillance data, comparing time to antivenom administration, clinical severity, specific clinical manifestations, and case-fatality before and after implementation. Occurrence of early adverse reactions from antivenom treatment was assessed. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with Indigenous patients, health-care providers, and health-system managers to assess acceptability, adoption, feasibility, fidelity, and sustainability of the intervention. PRINCIPAL

findingsAmong 125 patients treated after decentralization, the proportion receiving antivenom within 6 hours after bite was significantly higher than under usual care (75.8% vs 40.8%; OR 4·5, 95% CI 2·6-7·9). Proportion of mild envenomations were more frequent after decentralization (50.4% vs 32.7%; OR 2·1, 95% CI 1·2-3·6). Five deaths (4%) were reported in the usual care group and one death (0.8%) was reported in the intervention group (5.3, 95% CI 0.6-45.9). Three (2.4%) patients had mild skin adverse reactions, which were properly managed without need for hospital transfer. A high acceptability was observed among Indigenous users and health providers, combined with good compliance by the providers with the clinical protocol and improved trust in local health services. Health providers and managers at all levels expressed willingness to support sustained antivenom delivery in the study settings and scale up to other Indigenous areas.

conclusionDecentralization improved access to antivenom treatment and reduced poor clinical outcomes. Culturally adapted, decentralized care can be safely implemented in remote settings, with important implications for equitable health system strengthening.

Indexed as

AntiveninsSnake BitesAdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsBrazilChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntivenins

Identifiers

PMID42546063
PMCPMC13432097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.