ArticlePloS one2026
Application research of "Script Killing" immersive teaching method based on cross-experimental design during emergency department residency training rotations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the "Script Killing" teaching method and the traditional teaching method in enhancing the learning outcomes of emergency medicine resident trainees during the standardized training period, from May to October 2024, we recruited 30 resident physicians from the emergency department of Zhengzhou People's Hospital as the research subjects and randomly divided them into Group A and Group B. The experiment adopted a crossover design: the first stage (6 weeks) - Group A received traditional lecture-based teaching, while Group B received immersive Script Killing" teaching; the second stage (6 weeks) - the two groups exchanged teaching intervention methods. The assessment contents included satisfaction surveys, theoretical knowledge tests, practical skill evaluations, and patient-doctor evaluations. The experimental results were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 to adjust for confounding factors. The results showed that the satisfaction of the "Script Killing" group was significantly higher (P < 0.05), the theoretical scores were better (P < 0.05), and the practical performance was also better (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the traditional teaching group. No statistical differences were observed in patient-doctor feedback. These preliminary findings suggest that the "Script Killing" teaching method may effectively enhance the clinical operational abilities and learning satisfaction of emergency medicine trainees. Although limited by a small sample size and single-center design, this approach shows promise as a beneficial supplement to standardized residency training, warranting further validation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.