Observational studyCritical care explorations2026
Implementing a Green ICU Pathway Across a Large U.S. Health System: An Observational Study.
Observational study in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceICUs contribute substantial environmental impact within the healthcare industry, yet few practical solutions have been published to implement environmentally sustainable practices.
objectivesTo describe the implementation of a systemwide Green ICU initiative using a previously published sustainability pathway and to report early outcomes and lessons learned. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsObservational implementation study within a large, multihospital U.S. healthcare system with adult ICUs. The initiative focused on operational and systems-level ICU processes rather than individual participant outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A coordinated sustainability infrastructure was established through partnerships among ICU clinicians, the Office of Sustainability, supply chain, and a multidisciplinary "Critical Care Sustainability Work Group." External engagement was expanded through the creation of a national "Green ICU Collaborative." Pilot projects were developed across the "reduce, rethink, recycle" framework. All emissions calculations were done using the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's U.S. Environmentally-Extended Input-Output modeling framework, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change accounting principles. The methodology uses large language models for classification to enable scalable, consistent categorization of procurement activities. Key outcomes included medication waste reduction, supply use optimization, and recycling.
resultsMedication waste transitioned to on-demand preparation which reduced IV medication waste from 4.8% to 1.4%. Reduction in unnecessary supplies entering ICU rooms diverted an estimated 3401 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent annually across 350 ICU beds. A saline flush recycling program collected more than 1600 lbs of recyclable material in its first year. Implementation revealed critical lessons, including the need for early verification of material composition, the incorporation of patients and families into sustainability workflows, and the development of adaptable metrics that align unit-level initiatives with systemwide emissions baselines. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Operationalizing a Green ICU pathway in a large health system is feasible and produces measurable environmental and financial benefits. Establishing strong partnerships, structured processes, and adaptable evaluation strategies is essential for scaling sustainability efforts. This work provides a detailed implementation roadmap to advance Green ICU initiatives and contributes the guidance needed to a growing yet underdeveloped field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.