ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2026
Topic classification of synchrotron experiment proposals using the OpenAlex model: enhancing metadata granularity and assessing live service feasibility.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experiment proposals at synchrotron facilities serve as the primary gateway for instrument access. They currently lack the standardized and granular topic metadata necessary for tasks such as classification and review, and, broadly speaking, reuse. This paper defines and tests the feasibility of a real-time topic classification service for experiment proposals using an open-source machine-learning model and domain experts for the evaluation phase. We applied the OpenAlex topic classification model to 5384 experiment proposals and selected 209 of them to each be independently evaluated by three domain experts to assess the performance and utility of the model. Analysis of the evaluations reveals a general consensus among the reviewers regarding the model's predictions, with a Krippendorff's alpha of 0.572. We also find that 74.2% of the proposals had at least one topic that was unanimously deemed relevant, which suggests that the model performs well enough to be used in a live setting with real-time verification. However, we do not recommend using it in automated environments without human oversight, given the proposal-based precision score of 56.0%. By aligning the data infrastructure of photon and neutron facilities with the OpenAlex ecosystem, we also lay the groundwork for the eventual inclusion of proposals and experiment reports into OpenAlex, which is necessary for a complete record of a research activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.