ReviewAIDS and behavior2026
A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Adherence of Injectable PrEP Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Review in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa bear a disproportionate burden of HIV. Long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) may address adherence challenges associated with daily oral PrEP, but social and structural barriers threaten real-world implementation. Drawing on parallels with injectable contraception and multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs), this systematic review synthesizes evidence on barriers and facilitators to LAI-PrEP use among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed studies published January 2015 to February 2025 were identified across four databases. Studies were included if they examined barriers or facilitators to uptake or adherence of injectable PrEP, contraception, or MPTs among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Data were abstracted using a socioecological model adapted for PrEP implementation. Of 1,716 screened references, 53 met inclusion criteria, spanning 37 countries. Most studies focused on injectable contraception; only nine examined injectable PrEP, eight of which assessed hypothetical use. Cross-cutting barriers included fear of side effects, misinformation, stigma, and logistical and cognitive challenges related to return visits. Cross-cutting facilitators included familiarity with injectables, social support, and perceived privacy. Partner and provider power dynamics, restrictive sociocultural norms, provider gatekeeping, and health system limitations further shaped injectable use. Despite biomedical advantages, LAI-PrEP uptake among AGYW may face entrenched barriers similar to other PrEP modalities. Although AGYW's familiarity with injectable contraception may enhance LAI-PrEP acceptability, systemic and interpersonal challenges remain under-addressed. Effective LAI-PrEP implementation in the real-world will require integrating lessons from contraceptive programs, improving provider training, expanding delivery channels, and centering AGYW in decision-making to support equitable scale-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.