ArticleEndocrine2026
Time in tight range and time in range in relation to diabetic retinopathy and OCTA-derived retinal microvascular parameters in hospitalized adults with type 1 diabetes.
Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTime in Tight Range (TITR) is physiologically closer to normoglycemia than time in range (TIR) and has been linked to microvascular risk. We aimed to evaluate associations of TITR with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)-derived retinal parameters in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to compare its performance with TIR.
methodsWe retrospectively included adults with T1D who underwent continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and OCTA. TITR-DR associations were tested using multivariable logistic regression with restricted cubic splines. Linear mixed-effects models assessed TITR/TIR associations with OCTA-derived parameters, followed by exploratory threshold-based comparisons. DR discrimination of TITR versus TIR was assessed using ROC analysis.
resultsWe analyzed 259,568 glucose readings from 153 participants. Each 10-percentage-point increase in TITR was associated with 29.5% lower odds of DR (adjusted OR 0.705; p = 0.004), without evidence of nonlinearity. In continuous analyses, both TITR and TIR were positively associated with deep vascular complex (DVC) vessel density and perfusion area; in exploratory threshold-based analyses, the TITR 50% cutoff showed significant DVC differences, whereas the TIR 70% cutoff showed no consistent differences. DR discrimination was similar for TITR and TIR (p = 0.635), whereas TITR was more closely related to hypoglycemia exposure (p < 0.01).
conclusionsHigher TITR was associated with lower odds of DR and more favorable DVC vessel density and perfusion area in hospitalized adults with T1D. TITR showed DR discrimination comparable to TIR but may provide complementary information on hypoglycemia exposure and DVC differences in threshold-based analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.