ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Caste-specific nutritional signatures: Comparative physicochemical characterization of royal, worker, and drone jelly and larvae across developmental stages in Apis mellifera L.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differentiation between honey bee castes is essentially a nutritional phenotype, but the complex physicochemical inputs that play critical roles in endocrine and epigenetic programming are still poorly documented, particularly for worker jelly (WJ) and drone jelly (DJ), which are rarely characterized alongside royal jelly (RJ) and the larvae that metabolize them. Here, we compare RJ, WJ and DJ and queen (1-4 d), worker (1-5 d) and drone (1-6 d) larvae produced under standardized field conditions (15 colonies) in Ordu, Türkiye (18 biological groups) systematically with respect to caste and age. Moisture/dry matter and ash were determined gravimetrically, protein by Dumas combustion, sugars and 10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-HDA) using HPLC (RID/UV), minerals and heavy metals by ICP-MS, and acidity based on pH and titration. RJ complied with international composition standards: protein (12.90%) and 10-HDA content at the authenticity threshold (1.41%). WJ exhibited elevated protein (16.80%) and the highest titratable acidity (48 mL 1 N NaOH/100 g), alongside relatively enriched macro- and microelement profiles, particularly K and Mg, providing a distinguishing nutritional "signature" of larval foods; DJ showed the highest protein density of all matrices (18.37%). Sugar profiles suggested that glucose and fructose predominated, but a strong developmental pattern for sucrose became clear: large amounts of sucrose were present in 1-day-old larvae but absent from all later developmental stages, consistent with rapid turnover of the carbohydrate pool during early growth. RJ was the most acidic matrix (pH 3.96), and pH increased with larval age across castes suggesting buffering, tissue growth and remodelling in the context of aligned biomass accumulation. Together, these data establish comparative baseline datasets for caste-related larval foods and larvae, reinforce authenticity quality-control frameworks beyond RJ alone, and furnish a physicochemical basis for mechanistic studies linking food chemistry with caste-linked developmental physiology. These baseline data also offer practical reference points for veterinary monitoring of larval nutrition and colony health. Beyond providing a comprehensive reference dataset, the divergent nutritional profiles we observed particularly in protein, sugar, and 10-HDA dynamics suggest that the temporal coordination of these components may contribute to the canalization of caste-specific developmental pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.