ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
A comparative analysis of predicted spherical refractive outcomes between two swept-source optical biometers.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the predicted spherical equivalent (PSEq) between the ANTERION
methodsOcular biometry was performed by a single investigator for each patient scheduled for cataract surgery, with ANTERION and IOLMaster 700. Intraocular lens (IOL) power for TECNIS
resultsA total of 155 right eyes from 155 patients were analysed. The ANTERION consistently produced more hyperopic PSEq compared to the IOLMaster, with mean differences across all IOL formulas ranging from + 0.11 to + 0.18 D. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Agreement analysis demonstrated that the majority of data points between the devices were within the 95% limits of agreement (- 0.39 D to 0.79 D), regardless of the IOL power calculation formula applied. However, 15-25% of eyes showed a PSEq difference greater than 0.35 D.
conclusionsPSEq derived from ANTERION is slightly hyperopic compared to IOLMaster, with discrepancies significant enough to affect IOL power selection in up to 25% of eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.