Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545457›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026

A Timely Exploratory Study of Young Adults' Psychosexual Responses to the UK's New Age Verification Law on Online Pornography.

Yishu Li, Roger Ingham, Heather Armstrong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yishu LiCentre for Sexual Health Research, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. yl6y22@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0051-4763
Roger InghamCentre for Sexual Health Research, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Heather ArmstrongCentre for Sexual Health Research, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Chinese Government Scholarship 202408060104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-verification policies for online pornography aim to protect minors, yet their implications for legal-age young adults remain underexamined. This mixed-methods study examined UK young adults aged 18-25 who reported pornography use in the past year (N = 623, Mage = 21.40, SD = 2.31; 67.3% female). Participants completed measures of pornography use contexts, content preferences, and sexual shame, and answered open-ended questions about the UK age-verification requirements. Descriptive quantitative findings characterized participants' use contexts, preferences, and sexual shame. Qualitative accounts described varied psychological experiences, including shame, anxiety, confidence, calm, and minimal emotional impact. Participants often interpreted age verification as making pornography access feel less anonymous and more identity-linked, raising concerns about surveillance, moral stigma, and data vulnerability. Reported access practices included platform avoidance, alternative online spaces, reduced use, and VPN-based circumvention. The findings highlight the need to consider privacy, stigma, trust, accountability, and access displacement when evaluating age-verification requirements for legal-age users.

Indexed as

EroticaInternetSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultDigital MediaFemaleHumansMaleUnited KingdomYoung AdultAge verification lawdigital mediamixed methodonline pornographypsychosexual well-beingyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID42545457
PMCPMC13534180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.