ReviewInfection2026
Acute respiratory distress syndrome in scrub typhus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an important complication of scrub typhus and is associated with substantial mortality. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the proportion of hospitalised patients with microbiologically confirmed scrub typhus who developed ARDS. Secondary objectives were to estimate mortality among patients with scrub typhus-associated ARDS and to compare mortality between scrub typhus patients with and without ARDS.
methodsThis PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 2026 for studies reporting microbiologically confirmed hospitalised scrub typhus patients with extractable ARDS data. Pooled proportions and risk ratios (RRs) were estimated using random-effects models and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Prespecified subgroup analyses were performed for adult and paediatric populations. Methodological quality was assessed using design-specific Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.
resultsSixty-eight studies comprising 10,330 hospitalised patients with microbiologically confirmed scrub typhus were included. The pooled proportion of ARDS was 13% (95% CI 10%-16%; I² = 95.7%) across all age groups, with higher estimates among adults (15%, 95% CI 10%-21%) than paediatric patients (8%, 95% CI 6%-11%). Pooled mortality among patients with scrub typhus-associated ARDS was 21% (95% CI 13%-30%; I² = 76.5%), with higher estimates among adults (28%, 95% CI 13%-47%) than paediatric patients (16%, 95% CI 5%-29%). In 29 studies comprising 4,831 patients, mortality was substantially higher among patients with ARDS than among those without ARDS (RR 12.75, 95% CI 8.48-19.17; I² = 59.5%).
conclusionARDS occurs in a clinically important proportion of hospitalised patients with scrub typhus and is associated with a markedly increased observed risk of death. Estimates varied considerably across study settings, age groups, illness severity, and ARDS definitions. Early recognition of respiratory deterioration, timely anti-rickettsial therapy, and appropriate escalation of respiratory support are clinically important, but their specific impact on ARDS-related mortality remains to be further evaluated prospectively. REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251058577).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.