ReviewInfection2026
Mechanistic and molecular insights into emerging anti-virulence therapeutics.
Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health crisis and necessitates novel therapeutic strategies beyond traditional antibiotic, driving interest in anti-virulence (AV) strategies that disable pathogenicity rather than bacterial viability. This review provides an integrated overview of emerging AV approaches targeting quorum sensing, type III secretion systems, biofilm development, adhesion, toxin activity, iron acquisition, and host-pathogen interactions. We highlight representative phytochemicals, repurposed drugs, engineered inhibitors, nanomaterial-enabled formulations, and antibiotic-combination strategies that have shown promise across Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Across the literature, quorum sensing inhibitors and biofilm-disrupting agents are the most extensively explored, with many candidates demonstrating robust in vitro attenuation of virulence phenotypes. Type III secretion system inhibitors stand out for their mechanistic precision and, in several instances, stronger in vivo support, whereas host-directed and toxin-neutralizing strategies expand the therapeutic landscape but require cautious translational assessment. Importantly, the evidentiary strength of AV candidates is highly variable, ranging from docking-based hypotheses to animal-model validation, underscoring the need to distinguish preliminary leads from more advanced therapeutics. Collectively, the reviewed studies suggest that AV therapy is best positioned as a precision anti-infective strategy, particularly for chronic, device-associated, and multidrug-resistant infections where conventional antibiotics are less effective. Future progress will depend on improved mechanistic validation, rigorous safety and pharmacokinetic assessment, and translational frameworks that capture virulence suppression, host recovery, and treatment durability beyond bacterial killing alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42545450What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.