ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2026
Is memory spared in monkeys with selective lesions of the hippocampus?
Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is memory spared in monkeys with selective lesions of the hippocampus?Behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Normal explicit/declarative memory requires a system of anatomically related structures in the medial temporal lobe that includes the hippocampus and the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortex. Although extensive medial temporal lobe damage in primates causes robust anterograde amnesia, defining the contribution of the hippocampus proper has proved challenging. We revisited that enduring puzzle here, directly addressing a number of factors suspected to contribute to conflicting results across earlier studies. Among them, we explored the effects of selective hippocampus lesions produced by two common excitotoxin methods, ibotenic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid. Sample sizes were substantial, and all behavioral testing was conducted postoperatively. Performance was assessed on several standard procedures designed for monkeys, including multiple variants of the delayed nonmatching-to-sample test of visual object recognition, a series of rapidly acquired two-choice object discriminations, and a delayed response test of spatiotemporal memory. We used task-specific parametric manipulations (e.g., increasing retention intervals and reduced stimulus set size) to systematically vary demands on memory and test/retest analyses to enhance sensitivity for detecting impairment. Although both lesion groups sustained substantial hippocampal damage, their performance failed to differ from that of intact controls on any task, under any key test condition, regardless of data analytic strategy. The findings constrain plausible accounts of extant discrepancies in the literature and, moreover, highlight the need for fresh perspectives on the core operating characteristics of memory mediated by the primate hippocampus. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.