In one paragraphArticle in Emerging microbes & infections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
21 authors.
Zhixin WanDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-4411-6659 Ying ZhouDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-8874 Fanchong JianBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8703-3507 Jiali WuDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7935-3946 Wei XueDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Man Chun ChiuDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9503-6396 Yifei YuDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-0236-3213 Qiaoshuai LanDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5524-3542 Shuxin ZhangDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Zijun ZhaoDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-6283-2343 Xiaoxin ZhuDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Jingjing HuangDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Yidong YangDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-7696-3943 Yuhong LiuDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-1469-271X Xinjie MengDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6169-5729 Lin HuangBiomOrgan Ltd, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Xiang GaoLaboratory of Advanced Biotechnology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-4204 Hin ChuDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2855-9837 Cun LiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3003-0000 Yunlong CaoBiomedical Pioneering Innovation Center, School of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-1078 Jie ZhouDepartment of Microbiology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Pemivibart, a class 1/4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), is currently the only FDA-authorized SARS-CoV-2 mAb under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in clinical use. The emergence of subvariants, including KP.3.1.1 and XFG, raises concerns about antibody efficacy. SA55, a fully human class 1/4 mAb, is currently under clinical trial, including a nasal spray formulation. Using the well-validated organoid-based neutralization assays, we compared the potency and breadth of Pemivibart and SA55. Our results demonstrated a significant decrease in Pemivibart's activity against KP.3.1.1 and XFG, with an approximately 80-fold increase in IC50 relative to the ancestral strain. Given KP.3.1.1's strong reliance on the TMPRSS2 pathway for cell entry, we further demonstrated that combinational treatment with Pemivibart and the broad-spectrum S2 antibody results in potent neutralization. Notably, SA55 maintained potent neutralization (IC50 ≤ 40 ng/mL) across all tested variants. Topical administration, which models nasal spray, dramatically suppressed viral replication of BA.5.2 and XFG in organoid models. Our findings evidence the high potency of SA55, supporting its potential for clinical application against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Indexed as
Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentOrganoidsSARS-CoV-2AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCOVID-19Emergency Use AuthorizationHumansNeutralization TestsVero CellsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viralpemgardaneutralization assasysorganoidPemivibartSA55SARS-CoV-2
Identifiers
PMID42545256
PMCPMC13470914
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390