ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2026
The Impact of Robotization on Employees' Mental and Physical Health: A Qualitative Study in the Czech and Slovak Republics.
Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to explore the impact of introducing robotic technologies on employees' mental and physical health across three Czech and one Slovak manufacturing company. It sought to understand employees' subjective experiences and perceptions of organizational support during the robotization process.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted between 2023 and 2025 in four companies. 27 semi-structured interviews with employees (15 women, 12 men) and 19 unstructured interviews with managers (3 women, 16 men) were conducted on-site during working hours. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with open and axial coding.
resultsNine thematic areas were identified: general perceptions, change, fear, problems, support, social relations and communication, employee characteristics, physical health, and mental health. Employees generally perceived robotization positively, noting reduced physical workload and less monotonous or hazardous work. Initial adaptation was challenging, especially due to technical demands and workflow changes. Technical staff experienced higher stress than operators, related to responsibility, troubleshooting, and learning new skills. Technical malfunctions, elevated noise and vibration, and cognitive demands were reported as stressors. Personifying robots and informal knowledge sharing facilitated adaptation. No significant sleep disturbances or substance use linked to robotization were reported. Managers faced a high mental workload due to coordination and supervision responsibilities.
conclusionsWhen the implementation process is well designed, robotization does not necessarily negatively affect employees' mental health. The findings highlight the importance of actively addressing organizational and human factors that influence the success of technological change in the workplace. Attention should focus on monitoring cognitive and psychological demands, particularly for technical and managerial staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.