Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545226›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2026

The Ottawa Charter in practice: community-led action to reduce health inequalities in the UK.

Lisa McNally

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lisa McNallyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-6769-5825

Funding

Worcestershire Ring Fenced Public Health Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a practice-based case study illustrating how the action areas and strategies outlined in the Ottawa Charter can be put into practice and reduces neighbourhood-level health inequalities. The Priority Neighbourhood Development (PND) programme in Worcestershire focused on small, high-need geographical areas identified through analyses of emergency hospital admissions and socio-economic data. Work in the socio-economically deprived Westlands housing area is described in detail. Community development workers mapped local assets and deficits, enabling residents to challenge stigmatizing narratives and build positive place identity. A resident-led working group was established and supported with a devolved budget, facilitating locally determined actions such as expanding counselling provision, enhancing community facilities, developing arts and nature-based projects, and improving skills through training and youth-led initiatives. Co-location and outreach by health, housing, voluntary sector, and policing partners reoriented services towards prevention and accessibility. Evaluation after 18 months showed reductions in emergency hospital admissions and children's social care referrals, improved wellbeing, and reduced social isolation. Qualitative feedback highlighted increased empowerment, strengthened community action, and improved access to support. The model has since been scaled across the County and embedded into local policy and commissioning frameworks. The PND Programme demonstrates how neighbourhood-level investment, resident leadership, and cross-sector mediation can meaningfully reduce health inequalities and build healthier, more resilient communities.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesHumansNeighborhood CharacteristicsSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthUnited Kingdomcommunity developmentco-productionhealth inequalitieshealth promotionOttawa Charterplace-based

Identifiers

PMID42545226
PMCPMC13430650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.