ArticleClinical cardiology2026
Association Between Disruption of Blood Pressure Circadian Rhythm and Prognosis After Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Disruption of Blood Pressure Circadian Rhythm and Prognosis After Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the characteristics of blood pressure (BP) circadian rhythm disruption and its relationship with prognosis in patients with acute anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
methodsA total of 330 patients with anterior STEMI who underwent emergency PCI were enrolled in this study (MI group). Additionally, 131 physical examination patients were selected as the control group. Based on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) results, BP rhythm in both groups was classified into Extreme dipper, Dipper, Non-dipper, and Reverse dipper. The characteristics of BP rhythm were compared between the two groups. Patients with anterior MI were followed up for 1 year postoperatively. The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was compared among subgroups with different BP rhythms.
resultsThe proportion of dipper BP in the study group (11.21%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (63.36%) (p = 0.001). The proportions of non-dipper (43.03%) and reverse dipper (40%) BP in the MI group were higher than the control group (22.90% and 7.63%, respectively; all p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, using dipper BP as the reference, showed that reverse dipper BP was independently associated with MACE (HR = 6.417, p = 0.002). The cumulative risk of the primary endpoint event (Log Rank p = 0.021) was significantly higher in the reverse dipper group compared to the dipper group.
conclusionPatients with anterior STEMI are still under the burden of disrupted BP circadian rhythm and reduced dipper BP rhythm. The reverse dipper BP rhythm may serve as an independent factor of MACE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.