Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545079›Full record

ArticleStudies in family planning2026

Return Migration and Contraceptive Use in Mexico.

Ana P Canedo, Manon Tremouille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in family planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Return migration, whether voluntary or forced, can disrupt individuals' lives as they navigate life in a country that may feel unfamiliar. This disruption often extends to healthcare, including reproductive care. The migration experience, combined with differences between healthcare systems-in terms of availability, accessibility, and affordability-may create barriers to contraceptive access. This study utilizes data from the 2014, 2018, and 2023 National Survey of Demographic Dynamics (ENADID) surveys to analyze contraceptive use and access among female Mexican returnees. Findings indicate that returnees are more likely to use contraception than nonmigrants, particularly short-acting hormonal methods (SACs), while being less likely to rely on permanent methods. These patterns suggest that both migrant selectivity and adaptation shape contraceptive behavior. However, important differences emerge by time since return. Women who recently returned are less likely to use SACs and long-acting contraceptives and are more likely to obtain contraception from private clinics and pharmacies, compared to those with longer residence in Mexico. At the same time, there is little evidence that these patterns reflect shifts in fertility preferences. Instead, findings point more strongly to disruption and barriers to public healthcare following return. Overall, results highlight the need for reproductive healthcare interventions that better support return migrants during reintegration.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorHealth Services AccessibilityTransients and MigrantsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMexicoSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42545079
PMCPMC13578990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.