Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545066›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Disentangling objects' contextual associations from perceptual and conceptual attributes using time-resolved neural decoding.

Ariel H Kim, Genevieve L Quek, Denise Moerel, Olivia Gorton, Thomas A Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ariel H KimSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Genevieve L QuekSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Denise MoerelSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Olivia GortonSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Thomas A CarlsonSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans effortlessly relate what they see to what they know, drawing on existing knowledge of the perceptual, conceptual, and contextual attributes of objects while searching for and recognizing objects. Although prior studies have investigated the temporal dynamics of perceptual and conceptual object properties in the neural signal, it remains unclear whether and when contextual associations are uniquely represented. In this study, we used representational similarity analysis on electroencephalography (EEG) data to explore how the brain processes the perceptual, conceptual, and contextual dimensions of object knowledge over time. Using human similarity judgments of 190 naturalistic object concepts presented as either images or words, we constructed separate behavioral models of the perceptual, conceptual, and contextual properties of objects. We correlated these models with neural patterns from two EEG datasets, one publicly available and one newly collected, both recorded while participants passively viewed the same object stimuli. Across both datasets, we found that perceptual features dominated the early EEG response to object images, and conceptual features emerged later. Contextual associations were also reflected in neural patterns, but their explanatory power largely overlapped with that of conceptual models, suggesting limited unique representation of the contextual attributes of objects under passive viewing conditions. These results highlight the integration of perceptual and conceptual information by the brain when processing visual objects. By combining high temporal resolution EEG with behaviorally derived models, this study advances our understanding of how distinct dimensions of object knowledge are encoded in the human brain.

Indexed as

Concept FormationForm PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42545066
PMCPMC13440622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.