Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545046›Full record

ReviewJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2026

Does Waiver of Informed Consent in Low-Risk Randomised Controlled Trials Improve Research Inclusion? Insights from a Review of the UK Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group Register.

Alastair Watson, Kane Alexander, Estelle Payerne, Stephen Morris, Jonathan P Fuld, Polly-Anna Ashford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alastair WatsonSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-2567
Kane AlexanderChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Estelle PayerneNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Stephen MorrisPrimary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jonathan P FuldDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Polly-Anna AshfordNorwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-risk pragmatic trials improve clinical services. Informed consent is gold standard to ensure ethical research. However, its implementation can impact participation of underserved groups who face disproportionate barriers around communication, health and research literacy, and limited availability for burdensome processes. Carefully considered application of waived consent may overcome barriers to inclusive participation. However, an understanding of when waived consent has been used, whether it supported inclusion research, and lessons that can be learnt, is lacking. We reviewed the UK Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (HRA CAG) database for non-emergency individually randomised trials that were granted a waiver of consent. Nine trials were identified; these aimed to boost cancer screening uptake in deprived or underserved populations. Waived consent enabled inclusive research approaches for evaluating interventions such as culturally tailored screening kits and barrier-reducing tools. Further research is needed on patient perspectives and ethical safety in these consent models.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentPatient SelectionPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdvisory CommitteesConfidentialityEarly Detection of CancerHumansRegistriesUnited KingdomVulnerable Populationsinformed consentlow-risk pragmatic trialsresearch inclusiontrial designwaiver of informed consent

Identifiers

PMID42545046
PMCPMC13554342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.