Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42545020›Full record

Observational studyMicrobiology spectrum2026

Re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for detecting additional anaerobes in polymicrobial bacteremia.

Kensuke Shimbara, Hiroki Kitagawa, Kayoko Tadera, Yuta Kuhara, Keitaro Omori, Norifumi Shigemoto, Shinya Takahashi, Hiroki Ohge

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kensuke ShimbaraDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroki KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1651-0091
Kayoko TaderaSection of Clinical Laboratory, Division of Clinical Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuta KuharaDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keitaro OmoriDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Norifumi ShigemotoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinya TakahashiDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroki OhgeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP26K19497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaerobes are important causes of bloodstream infections, but may be overlooked in routine blood culture workflows because of their slow growth and frequent involvement in polymicrobial infections. We hypothesized that in polymicrobial bacteremia, rapidly growing organisms may trigger early blood culture positivity before slow-growing anaerobes have sufficiently proliferated, potentially leading to underdetection during routine subculture. In this observational study, we evaluated whether re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles improves the detection of anaerobic bacteria. All blood samples were cultured using the BacT/Alert Virtuo automated blood culture system. Adult patients with at least one positive anaerobic blood culture bottle were included. Positive anaerobic bottles were subcultured using the conventional method and then re-incubated for an additional 4 days before repeat subculture to detect additional anaerobes. Species were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, supplemented by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Of 310 patients with positive anaerobic blood cultures, 29 (9.4%) had an additional 36 bacterial isolates identified after re-incubation, of which only 3 were judged to be contaminants. Of 27 cases with two positive anaerobic bottles, additional organisms were detected in both bottles in 23 cases (85%), and concordant organisms were detected from the suspected infection focus in 9 cases (31%). Additional species identified following repeat incubation included

Indexed as

BacteremiaBacteria, AnaerobicBlood CultureCoinfectionAdultAgedBacteriological TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sanaerobic bacteremiablood culturediagnostic microbiologyMALDI-TOF mass spectrometryobligate anaerobespolymicrobial bacteremia

Identifiers

PMID42545020
PMCPMC13532278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.