Observational studyMicrobiology spectrum2026
Re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for detecting additional anaerobes in polymicrobial bacteremia.
Observational study in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaerobes are important causes of bloodstream infections, but may be overlooked in routine blood culture workflows because of their slow growth and frequent involvement in polymicrobial infections. We hypothesized that in polymicrobial bacteremia, rapidly growing organisms may trigger early blood culture positivity before slow-growing anaerobes have sufficiently proliferated, potentially leading to underdetection during routine subculture. In this observational study, we evaluated whether re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles improves the detection of anaerobic bacteria. All blood samples were cultured using the BacT/Alert Virtuo automated blood culture system. Adult patients with at least one positive anaerobic blood culture bottle were included. Positive anaerobic bottles were subcultured using the conventional method and then re-incubated for an additional 4 days before repeat subculture to detect additional anaerobes. Species were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, supplemented by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Of 310 patients with positive anaerobic blood cultures, 29 (9.4%) had an additional 36 bacterial isolates identified after re-incubation, of which only 3 were judged to be contaminants. Of 27 cases with two positive anaerobic bottles, additional organisms were detected in both bottles in 23 cases (85%), and concordant organisms were detected from the suspected infection focus in 9 cases (31%). Additional species identified following repeat incubation included
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.