SynthesisJournal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution2026
Rethinking Plasticity in Sponges.
Synthesis in Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
What lies behind the extraordinary phenotypic plasticity of sponges? We used this question to conduct a systematic review of how "phenotypic plasticity" is approached in the literature regarding the phylum Porifera. First, we gathered information on what the literature says about plasticity in sponges. Next, we analyzed its usage contexts, distinguishing between plasticity as a general feature versus a specific process linked to environmental triggers or genetic variation. Thus, we critique the overuse of synonymous terms that fail to capture the concept's complexity and advocate for greater precision to advance research. Finally, we advocate for precise and consistent terminology as an essential requirement for advancing research on sponge phenotypic plasticity. Phenotypic plasticity in sponges is a multifaceted phenomenon. We focused on the rationale behind the term's use and its underlying biological assumptions, proposing a categorization into three levels: (1) intraindividual/cellular plasticity, regarding modifications in a single organism's structures; (2) individual plasticity, involving whole-organism adaptation; and (3) population-level plasticity, where variability occurs among individuals of the same species. This framework distinguishes between changes within a single organism and broader variation patterns, highlighting scale-specific biological constraints. Recognizing sponges as highly plastic organisms was only the beginning. We advanced our comprehension by addressing key evolutionary questions and knowledge gaps that remain essential to guide future research on the molecular, ecological, and evolutionary implications of plasticity in this phylum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.