Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544878›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Systematic Screening of Communication Outcomes at Age 5 in Children Treated for Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis.

Justin Weinfeld, Christina Havstam, Marizela Kljajić, Clin Psychol, Lars Kölby, Peter Tarnow, Christina Persson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Justin WeinfeldInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-8627
Christina HavstamInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0015-9364
Marizela KljajićDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5185-8988
Clin PsycholDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Lars KölbyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.
Peter TarnowDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-0256
Christina PerssonInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7860-1573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research on communicative outcomes in children treated for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) has yielded inconsistent findings, with reported prevalence rates of communicative difficulties varying widely. These discrepancies are attributable to small samples, heterogeneous age groups, and reliance on indirect or non-domain-specific outcome measures. There remains a need for systematic, age-specific screening using validated tools to clarify the nature and prevalence of communicative vulnerabilities in this population.

aimsThe primary aim was to assess guardian-reported communicative abilities in a consecutive cohort of 5-year-old children treated for NSC and compare outcomes with normative data. Secondary aims were to examine whether reported difficulties were predominantly speech-language based or pragmatic, and to explore differences related to NSC subtype and timing of surgery. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This cross-sectional study included 157 children treated for NSC at a national craniofacial centre in Sweden. Guardians completed the Children's Communication Checklist-2 (CCC-2) as part of routine 5-year follow-up. General Communication Composite (GCC) scores and subscale profiles were analysed and compared with published normative data. Group differences across synostosis type and surgical timing were examined using parametric and non-parametric statistical methods. OUTCOMES AND

resultsEighty-five percent of children scored within the normative range on the GCC. Fifteen percent scored below the clinical cut-off, a proportion not significantly different from the normative sample. Group-level differences were primarily observed in the domains of speech and language, with significantly lower scores in speech and syntax, while pragmatic difficulties were uncommon. No significant differences were found between craniosynostosis subtypes. Earlier surgery was associated with higher GCC scores in children with metopic NSC only. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Most children treated for NSC demonstrate age-appropriate communicative abilities at 5 years of age. However, subtle vulnerabilities in speech and syntax were present in a subset of children. These findings support the use of screening in routine follow-up to identify children who may benefit from further assessment, while suggesting that broad language disorder-like profiles are uncommon in this population. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Previous studies report highly variable rates of speech and language difficulties in children treated for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC), ranging from low to markedly elevated prevalence. What this study adds to the existing knowledge In a large consecutive cohort of 5-year-old children treated for NSC, 85% showed age-appropriate communicative abilities as rated by their guardians and did not differ significantly from normative data. Group-level differences were confined to speech- and language domains (speech and syntax), while pragmatic difficulties were uncommon. Earlier surgery was associated with higher communication scores in children with metopic NSC only. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this study? Routine screening at follow-up is supported to identify speech- and language vulnerabilities in a minority of children treated for NSC. Broad language disorder-like profiles appear uncommon, suggesting that monitoring of speech and syntax may be more clinically relevant than global language screening alone.

Indexed as

Communication DisordersCraniosynostosesLanguage Development DisordersChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningSwedenTreatment Outcomecommunicationnon‐syndromic craniosynostosisscreening

Identifiers

PMID42544878
PMCPMC13430678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.