Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544866›Full record

ReviewSmall methods2026

Synergistic Considerations of Deposition-Stripping Mechanisms for Designing Highly Reversible Zinc Metal Anodes.

Xijun Liu, Renjun Tu, Yi Xiao, Qiangchao Sun, Xionggang Lu, Hongwei Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xijun LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Renjun TuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Yi XiaoSchool of Materials Science and Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Qiangchao SunSchool of Materials Science and Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-7119
Xionggang LuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Hongwei ChengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Refractories, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-6752

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52334009National Natural Science Foundation of China 52404423National Natural Science Foundation of China 52574471Open Research Fund of Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory 2023SLABFK12Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23ZR1421600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complex deposition-stripping behavior of zinc anodes is often accompanied by dendrite growth, hydrogen evolution, and corrosion, which severely compromise aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) reversibility and cycling stability. Although considerable efforts have focused on regulating zinc deposition, the stripping process remains relatively underexplored. In fact, stripping not only governs interfacial evolution and active material utilization but also influences subsequent deposition behavior, indicating that deposition and stripping are intrinsically coupled processes. From the perspective of deposition-stripping coevolution, this review systematically discusses the mechanisms of Zn

Indexed as

aqueous zinc‐ion batteriesdeposition‐stripping behaviorinterfacialzinc anodes

Identifiers

PMID42544866
PMCPMC13555649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.