ReviewMuscle & nerve2026
Addressing the Global Disparities in Access to Treatment in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.
Review in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of novel disease-modifying therapeutics for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) increased life expectancy with better motor function and potentially better quality of life. While the benefits of these therapies are well established, most trials were conducted only in high-income and middle-income countries, and there is a lack of global representation. Furthermore, although these medications are now approved in over 50 countries worldwide, they remain unavailable to many who need them, potentially widening the gap in clinical care. Moreover, with these therapies, the standard SMA phenotype is changing, and the percentage of adult patients in the SMA cohort is increasing rapidly, requiring adjustments and modifications to the traditional therapeutic approach to SMA. It is important to identify potential sources of health inequalities to address them. Clinical opportunities for access include expanding screening availability by employing novel, affordable technologies, improving continuity of care through patient registries, and ensuring transitions of care for long-term monitoring of adult patients with the disease. New technologies also offer the possibility of expanding the scope of telehealth to ensure access and of using artificial intelligence for rapid screening and disease monitoring. Regulatory changes and drug policies to reduce medication costs are also critical. Additional research on SMA population disparities and clinical trials that recruit from diverse populations and across the globe will help bridge the gap. Ensuring equitable healthcare access to disease screening and lifesaving medications is not just a recommendation but a call to action that can promote health for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.