Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544583›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2026

Good cop, bad cop? Rethinking the roles of cardiac macrophages in injury.

Janmes Karunamurthy, Ziyi Li, Ajitha Thanabalasuriar

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janmes KarunamurthyDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics and.
Ziyi LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics and.
Ajitha ThanabalasuriarDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac macrophages (CMs) preserve homeostasis in the heart by clearing cellular debris and facilitating electrical conduction. During tissue injury, embryonically derived CMs (em-CMs) have traditionally been deemed beneficial for promoting tissue repair, whereas monocyte-derived CMs (mo-CMs) are considered detrimental, contributing to inflammation and tissue damage. However, Kasam et al. challenge this binary classification using cardiac-specific strategies to expand either em-CM or mo-CM populations. As expected, mice with cardiac-specific mo-CM expansion exhibited adverse outcomes following transverse aortic constriction (TAC). Surprisingly, mice with expanded em-CMs also showed a marked decline in cardiac function after TAC, which was associated with an unexpected interaction with mo-CMs. This deterioration was temporally regulated, occurring only if em-CMs were expanded before TAC induction. Together, these findings suggest that simplistic classification of CMs as either beneficial or harmful underestimates their complex roles in cardiac pathology, highlighting the need to reassess current views of macrophage function in heart injury.

Indexed as

Heart InjuriesMacrophagesMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID42544583
PMCPMC13430007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.