ArticleAge and ageing2026
A policy scoping review of how 'Hospitals at Home' can and could support people with dementia.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeople with dementia are often hospitalised due to comorbidities and superimposed delirium and have poorer outcomes in hospital compared to people without dementia, especially among under-served groups. Hospital at Home (HaH) schemes could reduce these inequalities by facilitating care in a familiar home environment that offers similar outcomes to acute hospital care with lower risks of harms.
aimsWe aimed to investigate how dementia and cognitive impairment are considered within English health policy documents informing HaH implementation; considering potential impact on health inequalities and implications for future policy development.
methodsWe searched websites, including UK governmental, NHS, social care and professional organisation sources, from 2015; and reference lists of included documents. We thematically analysed documents.
resultsWe included 17 documents, comprising clinical guidelines (n = 5), government guidance (n = 4), policy papers (n = 3), service evaluations (n = 3), a strategy document (n = 1) and case study (n = 1). We developed three themes: (i) benefits of HaH for people with dementia, including more person-centred care and familiar treatment environments; (ii) how HaH can be inclusively designed for people with dementia, accommodating needs and mitigating concerns over digital exclusion and safety; and (iii) the critical role of family carers in enabling HaH, including potential carer burden. DISCUSSION: HaH models have potential to reduce health inequalities for people with dementia, but current implementation policies risk reinforcing inequalities, particularly among those without digital proficiency or carer support. Future policies should drive consistent inclusive eligibility criteria and processes for ensuring continuity with primary care, dementia care as a HaH staff core competency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.