SynthesisAge and ageing2026
Emergency department-initiated interventions to reduce risk of recurrent falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) following a fall are at high risk for recurrent falls, injuries and increased healthcare utilisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of interventions initiated upon ED presentation in reducing falls (primary outcome) and fall-related outcomes (secondary outcomes) among older adults.
methodsA comprehensive search was performed in Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PEDro, Web of Science, and Scopus up to June 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. This yielded 9624 references, of which 4811 records remained after deduplication and were screened for eligibility. Meta-analyses and descriptive methods, including vote counting, were applied where appropriate. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted.
resultsThirty articles were included. Interventions were associated with a significant reduction in fall incidence (rate ratio 0.69; 95% CI 0.54-0.88; I2 = 95%), supported by vote counting. While reductions were also observed in the proportion of fallers (odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.71-1.07; I2 = 61%), fall-related and all-cause ED revisits, hospital admissions, recurrent falls and mortality, these trends did not reach statistical significance. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with modified usual care showed a significant reduction in fall-related ED revisits and people sustaining an injurious fall. Secondary outcomes including quality of life, fear of falling and physical functioning generally showed trends favouring the intervention group. Considerable heterogeneity and variation in intervention characteristics were noted across studies.
conclusionInterventions for older adults presenting to the ED after a fall suggest a favourable effect on fall rate. Non-significant trends favouring the intervention group were observed for several other outcomes, but heterogeneity and methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.