ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Professional identity formation of family medicine residents in Singapore: a qualitative study to identify influencing factors.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysician burnout and retention are critical challenges in Family Medicine (FM). Professional Identity Formation (PIF) in family physicians (FP) fosters resilience and job satisfaction but is often overlooked in residency training, particularly in predominantly hospital-based programs where residents are disconnected from the primary care community. AIM AND
methodsThis qualitative study explored FP PIF in a predominantly hospital-based FM residency program in Singapore and identified factors influencing its development. Individual in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with FM residents and post-residency FPs selected through maximum variation purposive sampling. Data was collected and analysed iteratively using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Cruess et al.'s conceptual model for PIF was used as a sensitising framework, alongside Lankveld et al.'s framework describing psychological processes underlying identity formation.
resultsThirteen participants were interviewed. Three themes were constructed. First, FP PIF wasunderpinned by four psychological 'senses' of competence, connectedness, appreciation, and career trajectory. Second, reflection and socialization drove development of these senses by enabling meaning-making, learning and belonging within the FM community of practice (CoP). Third, residency program features both enabled and/or constrained PIF; while some components scaffolded PIF, more intentional support was needed. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionPIF is a dynamic, context-dependent psychological process shaped by reflective practice, social participation, and program structure. Intentional support through curriculum design and faculty practices may strengthen PIF. These findings extend existing PIF frameworks and have implications for curriculum design, faculty development, program evaluation, and future research on fostering PIF in hospital-based residency training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.