Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544275›Full record

ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

Effectiveness of Conventional & Jigsaw Method of Self-directed Learning and Interactive Lecture in Undergraduate Physiology Teaching - A Comparative Study.

Satabdi Saha, Debasish Chakraborty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Satabdi SahaDepartment of Physiology, Agartala Government Medical College & GBP Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.
Debasish ChakrabortyDepartment of Physiology, Agartala Government Medical College & GBP Hospital, Agartala, Tripura, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical professionals are expected to be lifelong learners, and the contemporary medical curriculum emphasizes learner-centered education with active student participation. The Competency-Based Medical Education framework promotes the use of active learning strategies such as self-directed learning (SDL), problem-based learning, and small group teaching. However, evidence comparing conventional SDL, the jigsaw method of SDL, and interactive lectures in undergraduate physiology remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these teaching-learning methods among first-year MBBS students at Agartala Government Medical College. Methodology: This educational interventional crossover study was conducted among 150 first-year MBBS students at Agartala Government Medical College from March to August 2025. Students were exposed to interactive lectures, conventional SDL, and the jigsaw method of SDL across cardiovascular (CVS), respiratory (RS), and central nervous system (CNS) modules. Knowledge was assessed using 10-item multiple-choice pre-tests and post-tests. Data were analyzed using paired and unpaired Student's Results: Baseline pre-test scores were comparable across groups (p>0.05; Conclusion: Jigsaw-based self-directed learning is more effective than conventional SDL and interactive lectures in undergraduate physiology teaching, particularly for integrative topics. Its structured cooperative framework produces meaningful educational gains and supports the objectives of competency-based medical education.

Indexed as

Interactive lectureJigsaw methodSelf-Directed Learning (SDL)Teaching Learning Method (TLM)

Identifiers

PMID42544275
PMCPMC13429059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.