ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Clinical Outcomes of Double C-Loop Haptic Intraocular Lenses Across Different Optic Designs: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the visual, refractive, and rotational stability outcomes of double C-loop haptic intraocular lenses (IOLs) across different optic designs. Methods: This retrospective study included 69 eyes implanted with PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs (Beaver-Visitec International, Inc. USA). A total of 23 eyes per group were analyzed at 3-months postoperatively. Subjective refraction, monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and rotational stability were evaluated in all cases. Results: In the PODEYE toric IOL group, 100% of eyes were within ±0.50D with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of 0.06±0.26D; in the Serenity toric IOL group, this percentage was 78.26% with a mean SE of -0.28±0.38D, while in the FineVision HP toric IOL group, 86.96% of eyes were within ±0.50D, with a mean SE of 0.22±0.30D (p<0.001). Mean CDVA was -0.02±0.04, -0.02±0.04, and -0.05±0.07 logMAR in the PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs groups, respectively (p=0.047). In the PODEYE toric IOL group, 23.81% and 100% of eyes achieved a cumulative CDVA of ≥20/16 and ≥20/20, respectively. Corresponding values were 17.39% and 100% for the Serenity toric IOL group, and 52.17% and 95.65% for the FineVision HP toric IOL group. Mean IOL rotation was 1.09±0.79, 1.70±1.72 and 1.78±1.31 degrees for the PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs groups (p=0.16). 100% of eyes exhibited rotation ≤10 degrees, and 100%, 91.30% and 100% of eyes in the PODEYE toric, Serenity toric, and FineVision HP toric IOLs groups, respectively, showed rotation ≤5 degrees (p=0.108). Conclusion: Double C-loop haptic IOLs provide excellent refractive, distance visual acuity, and rotational stability outcomes across different optic designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.