ReviewPatient preference and adherence2026
Best Evidence Summary for Evidence-Based Nursing Self-Management in Patients with Neurogenic Bladder Following Spinal Cord Injury.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To synthesize available evidence on self-management in patients with neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury using evidence-based methods, and to provide a reference for evidence-based nursing interventions. Methods: We conducted a best evidence summary following the methodological standards of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-based Nursing and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). We searched CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, RNAO, NGC, GIN, and Medlive from inception to October 2025. We included clinical guidelines, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, and evidence summaries. Quality was appraised using AGREE II for guidelines and JBI checklists for other types. Evidence was synthesized thematically and graded using JBI levels (1-5). Recommendation strength (A/B) was determined based on FAME (Feasibility, Appropriateness, Meaningfulness, Effectiveness) attributes. No meta-analysis was performed. Results: A total of 18 articles were included: 8 clinical guidelines, 2 expert consensuses, 4 systematic reviews, and 4 evidence summaries. The evidence was synthesized into 9 themes: comprehensive assessment, structured education, fluid management, device empowerment, catheter management, assisted voiding, complication monitoring, perineal skin care, and follow-up. A total of 26 pieces of evidence were formulated, with recommendations graded A or B based on the FAME framework. Conclusion: This study systematically synthesizes the available evidence on self-management in patients with neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury. The 26 evidence items provide a practical, evidence-based framework for clinical nursing decisions, particularly in the areas of intermittent catheterization training, fluid management, complication monitoring, and patient education. The application of evidence should be carefully adapted to the local clinical context, taking into account regional and economic differences, as well as individual patient characteristics such as upper limb function and cognitive status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.