Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544200›Full record

ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association

The Tyranny of Time: Analyzing Waiting Time as a Critical Driver of Patient Satisfaction in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital.

Selekeowei Peter Kespi Kpuduwei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Selekeowei Peter Kespi KpuduweiDepartment of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prolonged waiting time is a ubiquitous challenge in public hospitals in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), significantly impacting patient satisfaction and service quality. The study's objective is to analyze the components and impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction at the National Hospital Abuja (NHA). Methodology: In a cross-sectional study of 300 outpatients, time spent at different service points (records, nursing, doctor consultation, laboratory, pharmacy) and total hospital time were recorded. Satisfaction with these times was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent samples t-test. Results: The mean total time spent in the hospital was 247.5 minutes (~4 hours). The longest waiting time was to see a doctor (112.6 ± 86.6 minutes), while the shortest was with records staff (20.7 ± 29.5 minutes). Despite the long wait to see a doctor, patients were "Very Satisfied" (mean=3.60) with the consultation time itself. Overall satisfaction with waiting time (responsiveness) was the lowest among all quality domains (mean=2.99). Insured patients spent a longer total time (267.9 min) than uninsured patients (230.8 min), but satisfaction levels did not differ significantly (P-value = 0.33). Conclusion: Waiting time, particularly for physician consultation, is a major bottleneck and a key dissatisfier at the NHA. The discrepancy between long waits and high consultation satisfaction suggests that patients value the interaction once it occurs. To improve satisfaction, hospital administration must address the systemic failure of non-individualized appointment scheduling. Implementing a time-specific scheduling system is recommended as a crucial quality improvement intervention.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationNigeriaOutpatient ServicesPatient’s SatisfactionQuality ImprovementWaiting Time

Identifiers

PMID42544200
PMCPMC13429062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.