Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42544199›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Recurrent Dislocation Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Acute Proximal Humeral Fracture: Salvage With Large-Head Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Brachial Plexus Neuropraxia.

Saud N Aldanyowi, Neil Ashwood, Andrew P Dekker, Paul Erdman, Amol Tambe

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saud N AldanyowiTrauma and Orthopaedics, King Faisal University, Al Hufuf, SAU.
Neil AshwoodTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Burton-on-Trent, GBR.
Andrew P DekkerTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Burton-on-Trent, GBR.
Paul ErdmanTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Burton-on-Trent, GBR.
Amol TambeTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is commonly performed for complex proximal humeral fractures in older adults when fixation or anatomic reconstruction is unlikely to provide reliable outcomes. Recurrent instability following RSA remains a devastating complication, particularly in medically frail patients with poor bone quality and compromised soft tissue balance. Salvage strategies after repeated failed revisions are limited and often associated with poor functional outcomes. A 75-year-old man with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, transitional cell carcinoma, rectal polyposis, active smoking history, and frailty sustained a comminuted, displaced left proximal humeral fracture with subglenoid humeral head dislocation following a mechanical fall. He underwent hybrid reverse-polarity total shoulder replacement. One week postoperatively, the shoulder developed anterior instability requiring closed manipulation under anaesthesia. Despite a temporary reduction, recurrent instability persisted during rehabilitation, necessitating two subsequent open revision procedures, including liner exchange with adjustment of implant inclination and later glenosphere cup modification. Persistent instability led to referral and multidisciplinary review at a tertiary shoulder centre. The failed RSA was ultimately converted to a large-head bipolar hemiarthroplasty as a salvage procedure. The hemiarthroplasty later dislocated anteriorly, with migration of the prosthetic head into the anterior deltopectoral/coracoid region and severe upper-limb dysfunction suggestive of brachial plexus neuropraxia. Given the patient's significant comorbidities and elevated operative risk, further reconstruction was deemed unsuitable after shared decision-making, and conservative management was pursued. The patient subsequently developed septic arthritis of the contralateral shoulder, further worsening overall functional status. Serial imaging through 2025 demonstrated persistence of the dislocated bipolar implant without evidence of implant fracture or gross stem loosening. This case illustrates the catastrophic progression of recurrent instability following fracture-related RSA in a medically frail patient with compromised bone and soft tissue conditions. It underscores the importance of careful patient selection, accurate restoration of implant positioning and soft tissue tension, prompt tertiary multidisciplinary involvement after failed stabilisation, and realistic counselling regarding the limited salvage potential and persistent complications associated with hemiarthroplasty conversion after failed RSA. This case highlights that, in medically frail patients with multiple risk factors for instability, early recognition of recurrent dislocation and timely referral to specialist shoulder centres may help guide management decisions, optimise patient expectations, and avoid repeated interventions with diminishing likelihood of durable success.

Indexed as

bipolar hemiarthroplastybrachial plexus neuropraxiadislocationortho-surgeryproximal humeral fracturereverse shoulder arthroplastyrevision arthroplastysalvage surgeryshoulder instabilityupper extremity trauma

Identifiers

PMID42544199
PMCPMC13428678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.