ArticleClinical hematology international2026
Incidental perioperative detection of congenital methemoglobinemia: A prospective case series from a South Indian referral centre.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Congenital methemoglobinemia is a rare inherited disorder caused by impaired reduction of methemoglobin to functional hemoglobin, resulting in functional hypoxia despite normal arterial oxygen tension. Due to its often-mild clinical phenotype, diagnosis is frequently delayed or made incidentally. Methods: This prospective case series of surgical patients was conducted at a tertiary care center in South India over a one-year period. Patients incidentally diagnosed with methemoglobinemia during perioperative or acute medical evaluation were included. Diagnosis was established using arterial blood gas analysis with co-oximetry and confirmed biochemically by erythrocyte NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase activity. Results: Ten surgical patients were identified, all originating from a single geographic region. Methemoglobin levels ranged from 14.4% to 29.1%. Most patients were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, with diagnosis prompted by refractory hypoxemia and a characteristic saturation gap. Enzyme assays confirmed Type I congenital methemoglobinemia in all cases. Management was largely supportive, with methylene blue reserved for symptomatic individuals. Conclusions: This case series highlights incidental perioperative detection as a key diagnostic opportunity and suggests possible regional clustering of congenital methemoglobinemia. Increased clinical awareness and targeted screening may improve the diagnosis of this underrecognized condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.