ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2026
Offenders with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Clinical Case Series and Diagnostic Considerations in Forensic Psychiatry.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is increasingly recognized in adulthood, including in forensic settings, where its diagnostic and medico-legal implications remain insufficiently defined. Current evidence does not support a simple association between ASD and offending; rather, offender presentations in autistic individuals appear heterogeneous and are likely shaped by the interaction between core autistic features, intellectual and adaptive functioning, comorbidity, developmental adversity, and contextual stressors. Participants and Methods: This clinical-forensic case series describes seven offenders with ASD assessed within the Italian forensic psychiatric context. The cases encompassed multiple offending domains, including homicide, stalking, and persecutory acts, alleged sexual offending, property-related offending (arson), and domestic abuse. In several instances, ASD was identified for the first time during forensic evaluation in adulthood, often in the context of atypical presentations, variable cognitive functioning, and overlapping psychiatric or personality features. Results: Across cases, offending-related conduct appeared to arise through different psychopathological and developmental pathways, including rigidity and restricted interests, social naivety, impaired contextual understanding, concrete or idiosyncratic interpretations of interpersonal situations, emotional dysregulation, interpersonal vulnerability, and co-occurring psychopathology. The series also highlighted substantial diagnostic challenges in forensic practice, particularly where autism had remained previously unrecognized. These findings suggest that the forensic relevance of ASD lies not in diagnosis alone, but in the specific way autistic characteristics interact with cognition, adaptation, and contextual demands in shaping the behaviour under examination. Conclusion: This case series supports the need for a clinically integrated, developmentally informed, and individualized forensic psychiatric assessment of offenders with ASD. Standardized instruments may be informative, but only when interpreted within a broader formulation incorporating developmental history, cognitive and adaptive functioning, psychiatric comorbidity, and contextual factors. Improved recognition of underdiagnosed or atypical adult presentations may enhance diagnostic accuracy and support more appropriate decisions regarding criminal responsibility, risk management, and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.