ReviewNigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
Urine Iodine Concentration Trends During Pregnancy in The North-Central Region of Nigeria.
Review in Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy is a hyperdynamic state that significantly strains the mother's iodine stores due to the demands of the foetus. Iodine deficiency poses significant risks during pregnancy, affecting maternal and foetal health. Thyroid hormones, which are vital for brain development, rely on iodine, and deficiencies can lead to conditions like hypothyroidism and goitre. Monitoring urinary iodine concentration (UIC) is crucial for assessing iodine status, especially in pregnancy, where iodine plays a pivotal role in neurodevelopment. The aim of this study is to determine the urine iodine concentration changes and its adequacy in pregnancy. Methodology: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of nine (9) months (June 2019-February 2020). The study comprised a cohort of 250 pregnant women who were attending their antenatal clinic visits. These participants were selected randomly using a table of random numbers. Spot Urine samples were analysed using the Sandell-Kolthoff technique to measure UIC. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The mean ± SD urine iodine concentration in the 1 Conclusion: This study highlights the continued need for public health initiatives that promote iodine awareness and the use of iodized salt among women of reproductive age. Furthermore, the inclusion of thyroglobulin measurement alongside urinary iodine concentration may provide a more comprehensive assessment of thyroid function during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42544158PMC13429065What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.