ArticleCureus2026
Postoperative Pyoderma Gangrenosum Following Varicose Vein Surgery: Recognizing a Rare Surgical Mimic Before Extensive Tissue Loss.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis that frequently masquerades as a surgical site infection. Because its clinical presentation closely resembles postoperative cellulitis or even necrotizing soft tissue infection, diagnosis is often delayed. Misdiagnosis may result in unnecessary antibiotic escalation, repeated surgical interventions, and progressive tissue destruction due to pathergy. This case highlights the importance of early recognition of PG and serves as a reminder for surgeons to consider this uncommon diagnosis when postoperative wounds fail to respond to conventional treatment. A 75-year-old woman underwent elective open varicose vein surgery (ligation of neocrosse veins and phlebectomies) for recurrent symptomatic varicose veins of the left lower limb. One week postoperatively, she developed a painful erythematous wound that was initially diagnosed as a surgical site infection. Despite drainage, repeated wound care, and escalation from oral to broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy, the lesion rapidly progressed into an extensive necrotic ulcer. Repeated wound cultures and blood cultures remained sterile, while computed tomography scans demonstrated inflammatory changes without evidence of a drainable collection or necrotizing soft tissue infection. Following dermatological consultation, postoperative PG was suspected and confirmed by skin biopsy. High-dose systemic corticosteroid therapy was initiated, resulting in rapid clinical improvement, cessation of ulcer progression, and subsequent wound healing. This case illustrates the diagnostic challenge of postoperative PG and emphasizes several clinical features that should prompt reconsideration of a presumed surgical site infection, including disproportionate pain, rapidly progressive ulceration, sterile cultures, failure of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and inconclusive imaging findings. Early recognition is essential, as surgical manipulation may exacerbate disease progression through pathergy. Postoperative PG should be considered in any patient presenting with a rapidly progressive postoperative wound that fails to improve despite appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Increased awareness among surgeons may facilitate earlier diagnosis, prevent unnecessary surgical procedures, and reduce the risk of extensive tissue loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.