ArticleThe International journal, advanced manufacturing technology2026
Deep learning based load station inspection for smart manufacturing with limited data.
Article in The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fast and accurate industrial Load Station (LS) inspection is crucial in manufacturing environments. This study addresses the challenges of deploying a deep learning-based solution for LS inspection in semiconductor wafer handling, where the Load Station must be properly aligned and occlusion-free before pin pack assembly operations. A significant challenge in industrial settings is data scarcity, as collecting and annotating large amounts of datasets is often impractical due to operational constraints and the rarity of abnormal conditions. This study examines how training data size affects inspection reliability in a real-world smart manufacturing context. The experiments utilise YOLOv5 and YOLOv8 variants across five training set sizes to determine minimum data requirements for reliable deployment, evaluated under 5-fold cross-validation with multiple random seeds. Our results demonstrate that YOLOv8 achieves superior data efficiency, with only 40 samples per class (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.