ArticleMuscle & nerve2026
Revisiting the Extrapolated Reference Values (E-Ref) Estimation.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
aimsExtrapolated reference values (E-Ref) is a method to extract reference values (RVs) from a mixed data set (i.e., a data set containing normal and abnormal findings). This is an attractive way for any laboratory to develop their own RVs. Since its original description, we have made enhancements to the E-Ref method. Due to growing interest in this methodology, we describe our current version of the algorithm and interpretation of its results.
methodsThe cumulative distribution function (CDF) is the foundation of E-Ref methodology. Computer simulations were used to generate "normal" and mixed data sets of conduction velocity. The E-Ref algorithm was revised based on the analysis of CDF in the simulation studies. Bootstrap analysis was performed to assess the variability of estimates and finalize the RV. Median motor nerve conduction parameters from patient studies were analyzed.
resultsThe CDF shows a "plateau" that contains the majority of the normal data even in a mixed data set. The mean of data in the plateau approximated the mean of "normal" measurements. The difference between the maximum and minimum in the plateau was close to two standard deviations (SDs). DISCUSSION: The new algorithm establishes three ranges to define findings: definitely normal, definitely abnormal, and borderline. This is consistent with the customary clinical thought process where abnormalities are not "black and white." Bootstrap analysis must be performed for reliable estimates. This may be useful to assess the adequacy of the sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.