Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543826›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2026

Eye Tracking Insights Into Movement Preparation and Execution Under Nonstandard Visual Movement Feedback.

Felix Quirmbach, Jens R Helmert, Sebastian Pannasch, Annika Dix, Jakub Limanowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felix QuirmbachFaculty of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6831-6887
Jens R HelmertFaculty of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian PannaschFaculty of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6673-9591
Annika DixChair of Automobile Engineering, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Jakub LimanowskiCentre for Tactile Internet With Human-In-The-Loop (CeTI), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-5500

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390696704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For eye-hand coordination, predictions of sensory movement consequences may already be issued, and adjusted, during action preparation. In this pre-registered study, we combined a delayed-movement paradigm with a virtual reality-based eye-hand tracking task to investigate the oculomotor correlates of planning and executing coordinated eye-hand movements under standard versus nonstandard visual hand movement feedback. We measured pupil dilation and gaze-hand tracking during action preparation and subsequent task execution, where visual movement feedback violated or matched cued expectations: Participants prepared and, after a delay period, executed hand movements. Their movements were reflected by congruent or incongruent (inverted) movements of a glove-controlled virtual hand model, which they had to follow with their gaze. In the preceding delay period, visual cues could specify the to-be-executed movement (or leave it unspecified), and the visuomotor mapping (congruent or incongruent, 75% cue validity). We found that during the delay, pupil diameter increased more strongly when the movement was pre-cued (compared to left unspecified), and when nonstandard compared with standard visual movement feedback was expected. During execution, gaze-hand tracking performance decreased under nonstandard mappings, but significantly less so when the to-be-executed movement was pre-cued. Expectation violation trials produced a significantly stronger pupil dilation, particularly when congruent (standard) visuomotor expectations were violated, but also when incongruent mappings were cued but congruent ones observed. Furthermore, expectation violation impaired tracking performance; again, more strongly when congruent visuomotor expectations were violated. Our results indicate that oculomotor responses can reflect processes related to motor planning and flexible forward prediction of sensory action consequences ahead of execution, that is, increased mental effort and expectations of sensory conflict. Moreover, our results suggest that specific expectations about visuomotor (in)congruency affect eye-hand coordination and pupillary responses during subsequent execution of the planned action.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsFeedback, SensoryMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceAdultCuesEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHandHumansMalePupilVirtual RealityYoung Adultactioneye trackingmovement preparationvirtual realityvisuomotor mapping

Identifiers

PMID42543826
PMCPMC13430085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.