Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42543793›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026

Not all NTRK fusions in mesenchymal neoplasia are driver events: implications on classification and targeted therapy.

Mohamed A Yakoub, Purvil Sukhadia, Carla Saoud, Meera Hameed, Cristina R Antonescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed A YakoubDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Purvil SukhadiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carla SaoudDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4540-6990
Meera HameedDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Cristina R AntonescuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9717-8205

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Targeting Oncogenic Pathways in Genetically Complex SarcomasP50CA217694 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Marc Ladanyi · 2018 to 2026
$21.5M
Cycle for SurvivalKristen Ann Carr FundNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217694NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIH HHS P50 CA217694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NTRK fusions drive the pathogenesis of a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms with significant impact on classification and targeted therapy. However, unexpected NTRK fusions have been reported in other sarcoma entities, raising uncertainty over their specificity and clinical management. Herein, we investigate the incidence and structural variants of NTRK fusions among a large clinicopathologic and molecular sarcoma cohort. The goal was to distinguish primary driver NTRK fusions from potential passenger events and correlate with sarcoma histotypes. NTRK1-3 fusions were queried across a large spectrum of sarcomas, profiled by targeted DNA and/or RNAseq. Fusions were classified as oncogenic when NTRK was the 3' partner, in-frame, retained kinase domain (KD), and/or RNAseq confirmation; fusions of uncertain significance (FUS) when out-of-frame, lacking full KD, and/or RNAseq negative. We identified 48 cases with NTRK fusions, detected either by pathologist-initiated RNAseq for diagnosis (n = 27) or by clinician-initiated DNAseq for therapeutic target discovery (n = 21). For the latter subset, reflex RNAseq was activated for confirmation. Integrated review confirmed 33 (69%) oncogenic fusions. Remaining were FUS, apart from one indeterminate. In all except three cases, oncogenic fusions occurred in canonical NTRK-driven histotypes. In contrast, NTRK FUS were detected in various pathologic entities, including well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 9, 60%), two osteosarcoma, and single cases of other subtypes. NTRK1 fusions were the most common in both oncogenic and FUS groups (61%, 67%). CDKN2A/B deletions were observed mostly in oncogenic NTRK1 fusions (71%), while MDM2/CDK4 amplifications in the NTRK1 FUS. The FUS group demonstrated lower NTRK mRNA expression, with a mean of -4.60, p < 0.001. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive in cases with oncogenic NTRK fusions, and negative in FUS cases. Only two-thirds of NTRK fusions detected were functional drivers, mostly from pathologist-driven testing of suggestive histotypes. In contrast, genomic profiling in complex sarcomas often yields passenger FUS, lacking functional impact.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, trkAReceptor, trkCSarcomaAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGene FusionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyBiomarkers, TumorNTRK1 protein, humanNTRK3 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionReceptor, trkAReceptor, trkCdriverfusionMDM2 amplificationNTRKNTRK fusionsoncogenic driverpassenger fusionsarcomatargeted therapyTRK inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42543793
PMCPMC13430059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.